Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Blogs > OneStrangeBeast > The Beast Burrow |
Squirt revisited.
Squirt revisited. The Beast covered the phenomenon of female "squirting" years ago here in the Burrow, but I thought I'd revisit the topic once again. There are still a large number of women who either claim to be squirters in their profiles, or express the desire to find a partner who can make them squirt. I've said it before and I'll repeat myself here. You aren't squirting. To be more specific...you aren't squirting what you think you may be squirting. What you're doing is pissing the bed, floor, car seat, or other location you're occupying at the moment you achieve the mythical squirt. That's not to say you and your partner aren't having a grand time, or that you aren't genuinely feeling extra satisfied. It's just a fact. There isn't a Top Secret reservoir hidden deep inside your lady parts which holds a cup of "squirt" just waiting to be tapped. Science would have found that sucker by now. All serious research into squirting has revealed the liquid to be chemically identical to urine, because that's what it is. Researchers have even measured the amount of liquid in women's bladders before and after they achieve DEFCON SQUIRT, and sure enough, their bladders empty during the event. All The Beast is saying is that you can change your list of kinks from including Squirting to enjoying Golden Showers. |
|||
|
lol...oh kaaayyy...i am a squirter but now i am a bed wetter... how that sounds to you...lol...
| ||
10/24/2020 5:29 pm |
Wowo...hot
| ||
|
You are WRONG. Have you tasted a woman's juice that squirts out? It is NOT URINE.
| ||
|
You aren't actually telling me that I'm wrong. You're telling the scientists who have proven what I'm saying that they're wrong. Maybe there's a Nobel Prize waiting for you if you can prove otherwise.
| ||
|
If YOU cannot prove your point, then you ARE wrong. You obviously have never had sex with a woman who DOES squirt. Until you do, stick to what you know. By the way, scinece has proven that it is impossible for bees to fly, so you should inform the bees that they are not actually flying. Now THAT will earn you a Nobel Prize.
| ||
|
LOL. Such hostility. I think I did prove my point by including the headline to the article discussing the scientific study. The only evidence you provided was that you don't believe "squirt" tastes like urine. Without conducting a scientific study of my own, I would imagine that being sue to the liquid being prematurely coaxed from the bladder before it's had time to fully convert to what we call urine. On a side note - Scientists have no problem with the flight of bees. Non scientists do.
| ||
|
In case one article wasn't enough, here's another discussing, once again, how "squirt" is primarily urine.
| ||
|
LOL. Such hostility. I think I did prove my point by including the headline to the article discussing the scientific study. The only evidence you provided was that you don't believe "squirt" tastes like urine. Without conducting a scientific study of my own, I would imagine that being sue to the liquid being prematurely coaxed from the bladder before it's had time to fully convert to what we call urine. On a side note - Scientists have no problem with the flight of bees. Non scientists do.
| ||
|
LOL. Yes. I'm sure you broke out some test tubes and did a chemical analysis. You're just being ridiculous at this point. I'm not presenting my opinion. I've given two different articles which discuss the actual, scientific, laboratory proven results. You keep telling me I have to prove what I'm writing about. Scientists have already done that. You haven't proven a thing. All you've done is repeatedly assure the readers that you're pretty sure you haven't been tasting urine. Keep believing your taste buds are better than laboratory equipment . I'm done.
| ||
|
And...to repeat myself as my final thought... The reason the squirt you've encountered didn't fully taste or smell like urine should have in your mind is most likely due to it being prematurely expelled before fully going through the digestive processes which create urine. The women most likely didn't need to urinate already or they would have probably done it before getting down to business. But, again.... enjoy believing you've got it all figured out and that anybody who says otherwise must have never made a woman squirt themselves.
| ||
|
It has been fun exchanging information with you. Like I said before, stick to what you know, which appears to be COSPLAY. That is REALITY to you, but it must be exciting.
| ||
|
If anyone would care to read the results published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, I've provided a link if it works. They mention that the bladders of the test subjects would quickly refill during sexual arousal even though they had emptied their bladders just before the experiment. That supports my previous assertion that the liquid doesn't have time to fully convert to urine before being expelled. You can trust a scientific journal or a random taste tester on Affairlook. Your choice. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jsm.12799
| ||
|
Thanks for the links, but I have already read several scientific journals on the subject, and I do not agree with them. I trust my own experiences.
| ||
|
Pure genius walks amongst us.
| ||
|
There is one in every corner. Question... what would you do if a woman you are having sex with "squirts" on you?
| ||
|
As A squirter myself all I will say is ITS NOT URINE yes its odorless colorless and definately does NOT taste like urine at all Ones who CANT shudnt chime in even including Scientests Visit my [blogonelastchan00] to enter my[post4439715]
| ||
|
OK, onelastchan..... If it's not primarily urine, what exactly is it and where is it hiding before being expelled? I'm not talking about a bit of thick, whiteish gush running down the thighs. I'm talking about the women who literally shoot out half a cup or more of the mostly thin, clear liquid that soaks the sheets. If it isn't coming from the bladder, someone please enlighten me as to where that much liquid is hiding that medical science can't seem to find a location for?
| ||
|
At this point, I honestly just think people don't want to admit they're playing with pee.
| ||
|
I'll give you doubters this much. You're technically correct according to my initial beliefs which have been backed up by two different studies now. The liquid isn't "fully" urine. It doesn't stay in the bladder long enough to completely convert chemically. You could also take partially digested food from the large intestines and claim it isn't fully shit yet. You know.....if that's your thing.
| ||
|
Patiently waiting for someone to claim the Skene's glands hold half a cup or more of clear liquid and doctors just haven't figured it out yet.
| ||
|
I'll give you doubters this much. You're technically correct according to my initial beliefs which have been backed up by two different studies now. The liquid isn't "fully" urine. It doesn't stay in the bladder long enough to completely convert chemically. You could also take partially digested food from the large intestines and claim it isn't fully shit yet. You know.....if that's your thing. Visit my [blogonelastchan00] to enter my[post4439715]
| ||
|
LOL.... 1) Google "Women pissing standing up." and I'll bet you my next paycheck that women can, in fact, squirt urine several feet if they practice. 2) I've already explained multiple times that the liquid doesn't stay in the bladder long enough to fully convert to its smelling, tasting, and eye burning full potential, but keep ignoring that. 3) I see at no point did you actually attempt to explain where that much liquid could otherwise be hiding in the body or what its composition might otherwise be. 4) Have fun playing with pee everyone.
| ||
|
"Results: Female ejaculation orgasm manifests as either a female ejaculation (FE) of a smaller quantity of whitish secretions from the female prostate or a squirting of a larger amount of diluted and changed urine. Both phenomena may occur simultaneously. The prevalence of FE is 10-54%." "Diluted and changed urine." Damn those scientists and their chemical analysis.
| ||
|
How much does someone want to bet that if the scientist's (male or female) findings supported the doubter's positions they would suddenly believe the science over their taste buds, eyes, or noses....
| ||
|
LOL. I don't want to be accused of "mansplaining" next, so I'll get an assist from a woman. LOL
|
Become a member to create a blog