Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > rm_jdavid83071 > The disregard of inhibitions. |
The pitfalls of improper forecasting...
|
The pitfalls of improper forecasting... I had initially intended to bring up our wonderfully misunderstood "g-spot" earlier than this, but I find that as my "popularity" increases, so too does my potential for topics. I realize that the g-spot is a topic that several out there would like to,  )So, I will not disappoint, even though I have about twelve other topics bouncing around in my kinky little head. Let me say this, the "Gräfenberg spot" is a very real thing and has been documented as a legitimate part of the female anatomy. Anyone that tells you otherwise is obviously (not female, but more appropriately) an idiot! Ernst Gräfenberg a German gynecologist merely hypothesized it's existence some almost fifty years ago. It's acceptance in popular culture has been one of very mixed emotions. The primary roadblock that it faces in it's road to becoming more widely realized, is that it is in the woman. Sexist? No! Women have long been viewed as the ones that must be the clean and pristine member of coitus and if that fact be altered, she is seen as dirty, slutty, or worse. Anatomically speaking, we all start out as a genderless organism, primarily female though. In the stages of development that determine our sex this organism undergoes the metamorphosis into the specific gender it will emerge as (that is if all goes according to plan, but the combination of genders does occur and is a topic for a different discussion). This organism does not shed these different organs, it merely converts them as appropriate to whichever be the dominant hormone. Now take that into consideration the next time someone tells you that the organ in question does NOT exist! O.k., Mr. Science, if it doesn't exist... where the hell did it go!?! -What the hell are you talking about dude?- O.k., o.k., I apologize, I must admit, lack of sex and a raging migraine has got me a tad on edge... In the transition from female to male, because all the body parts are there to begin with and simply undergo a change in appearance and location, imagine if you will that the female anatomy is the "drawing board" for the formation of the male anatomy. AAhh, completely different then that whole "Adam and Eve" story huh? Wait it get's better! Medical research is so completely backward in it's understanding of the natural progression of the human body that it almost insults me to call myself human. Research is equating the "Skene's glands", and the "urethral sponge" to the male prostate gland. Which in and of itself is an accurate interpretation, however, it didn't START as a prostate gland! The female anatomy is the primary, male is the SECONDARY!! O.k., enough of that, the clitoris becomes the head of the penis, the labia join to form the scrotum, the ovaries descend into testes, getting the idea here? The existence of the "Skene's glands", "Urethral Sponge", "Gräfenberg spot" are not in question, they are there folks! The question that remains is why we, as males have attached this stigma to allowing our ladies to enjoy sex as much, if not more than we do? I have been reading the writing's of one of my blog's most loyal followers and in one of her statements she says that she is made to feel like some sort of mutant (sorry ILMK, couldn't find the actual quote my dear) and this disgusts me! When we (men) cum all over the fricken place and make a sticky mess of everything, we are seen as virile and major studs because we could dowse our conquests with our emissions. But if a woman so much as drips a half a teaspoon of liquid from her pussy, she is seen as some medical anomaly?? Well, as par usual, I have ranted about one aspect of the topic and neglected to point out the specifics. One thing that I must emphasize, fellas, if you have a woman that is capable of achieving an orgasm that produces copious amounts of fluid, consider yourself lucky, it means she is most assuredly satisfied. Also, for the dipshits that are convinced that they have just been "pissed" on... break out your chemistry set and x-ray machines. Chemically female ejaculate is more similar to male ejaculate than it is to urine and it is produced by the "Skene's glands" and not the bladder! Why did you go from the "g-spot" to squirting? Because they are more often than not an homologous experience, plus, that's just how I roll baby! -PeLoKi- Your Doctor of Love (sans Doctorate), *J* |
Become a member to create a blog
