Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > Andrew > Comments from the CEO/Founder |
Status of upgrades to groups and friend network
|
Status of upgrades to groups and friend network As you might have noticed, the much anticipated upgrades didn't go live last week. Here's what happened and the current status (for those who don't want to read the details, we are going to try to upgrade again Monday/Tuesday of this coming week)... starting with smaller sites. Both: Currently, the site displays members of groups or friend networks regardless if that member's profile is available or if they are still a member of the site. Doing this makes it easier to get a count of members (b/c we don't have to check if each is active). The new code will check to see the status of each member before showing it to you. While it's fast for small groups and networks, those with 10,000+ members bog down. Much of our work this past week was to find ways to speed this up (the way databases work, if any pages are slow, it could slow down currently fast pages). The new upgrades will let you sort groups and friends by last login, age, date joined network, handle, etc. One thing people will notice right away is that the number of friends/members shown on main pages will be different than what they see on friends/member lists. This is because the larger number is the total number of candidates and the smaller is only the number of members who have an active profile. While we put text on the page to explain things, there will be people who freak out. Group Changes: - Very large groups will automatically have activity requirements for members to be shown as active. This is helpful for groups with 100,000 "members" who don't contribute to the group as well as helps speed up the display of members. - The format of group members will also change and look more similar to search result listings (with links to view blogs, etc). Friend Network Changes: - We will only show the most recent 100 invites at a time. Some members get thousands of invites that they don't respond to. By requiring a decision on the first 100 before seeing more, members will know if their invites are accepted earlier. We will also delete invites that are older than 3 months. - One delay has been in internal debate on how friend "links" are maintained. One-way verses Two-way. Currently, if either party of a friendship removes the other from his/her list, the removed person still sees the other in his/her list. Doing this enables people to keep track of "potential" friends but can get confusing. If we break both links when either member cuts the friend link, then friends would "disappear" from the member's list. I'm personally leaning towards making this change (feedback please?) but it will not be part of this release. Friends and groups code has been around for over five years and had too many patches on patches added. Before fixing bugs and adding features, the goal is to simplify the software. This will make future improvements easier to do. We have reduced the size of the software by over 4,000 lines since this process started three weeks ago. I share member's frustration that the improvements didn't make it live last week. We just want to ensure that the upgrades will be an improvement (faster, less buggy, and more capability). I'm not only the CEO, I'm a member too... will do all I can to help get upgrades live as soon as possible. Thanks so much for your patience.  |
||||
5/7/2006 2:44 pm |
Personally, I'd be thrilled if the friend link would allow us to disappear from the other person's list when we decline the invitation or delete them from our own list.
| |||
5/7/2006 2:48 pm |
Interesting changes. I am not dead yet
| |||
5/7/2006 2:51 pm |
Thank you for the update. Why not delete invites older than 30 days? Break both links in the friends network, it makes more sense this way. I would rather have a delay than slower, buggy updates.
| |||
5/7/2006 2:55 pm |
Thanks for all your great work Luvpump, glad it's you managing this place and not me LoL Tickles
| |||
5/7/2006 2:55 pm |
On Groups: I'd love to see the 'Associate Member' disappear and instead the member be removed from the group. If a person really wants to be a member, they will rejoin. Otherwise it just clutters up the group as well as the database. On Friend Network: If one removes the link, I believe both links need to be removed. Obviously there's a reason for the termination of the link on one end, it makes no sense to keep it on the other. Keep up the good work...the new changes are definately a step in the right direction....
| |||
|
"If we break both links when either member cuts the friend link, then friends would "disappear" from the member's list. I'm personally leaning towards making this change (feedback please?) but it will not be part of this release" I personally would say break the links cleanly on both ends. If a member decides to remove a member from their network of friends, how do you declare the individuals as friends? In concerns to Groups: Will these updates with the removal of 4000 lines help speed up the process of postings through the database? Majority of members are getting frustrated that their postings can and have been taking up to 72 hours to being displayed and are losing many postings that they submitted. I know over the weekend alone in my own group that at least 12 postings of mine were lost completely. I know that the postings are scanned for certain words or phrases, but for the life of me I do not understand why the affiliate sites of Various Inc. are within that scanning process when it is no mystery to the members that the sites are linked together; such as Passion, Hotmatch, Adult-Friend-Finder, etc... and if abbreviated they are edited. Just my opinion that their is unnecessary clutter in the scans of postings. Nick
| |||
5/7/2006 3:05 pm |
I have a suggestion actually make sure people are posting questions in the advice lines and not just erotic stories. I use to enjoy the advice lines and met some wonderful folks there too but lately there isn't much except for stories. Also I vote that Affairlook should have an erotic art gallery of some sort for the member's like myself who like to draw it and share it. Just my two cents from the peanut gallery Juicy 
| |||
5/7/2006 3:16 pm |
Just a note on the old invites: sometimes people are unable to really tend to their invites due to time, travel, and internet access constraints. It would be nice to still be able to have them stored for a length of time, although, personally, I feel 3 months would be sufficent. Or perhaps the time length could be an option that we could set individually?
| |||
5/7/2006 3:25 pm |
Again hmmmmm?  Carpe Diem
| |||
|
"luvpump replies on 5/7/2006 3:23 pm: Just people will complain that their friends "disappeared" if we cut both links (can't please everyone) Yes, once the code is cleaned up, we will be streamlining the process that posts go live (similarly to how we do it for blogs)." I definitely see your point. Very logical. I am looking forward to what is coming this week hopefully. This is something I leave for you Andrew. [post 283957] Your1DreamLover Nick
| |||
5/7/2006 3:45 pm |
inmho, when I remove a friend from my network, my status as friend should also be removed automatically. This is why: 1) I might accept someone as a friend and then later find they behave a way on the site in which I don't want to be associated. 2) At first, I accepted everyone who asked to be in my network because I didn't know what I was doing. A newbie has no way of understanding the ramifications of being in a friend's network. We should be able to control which networks we are in. 3) The very reason you listed as a GOOD reason to keep the second link is a BAD reason in my book! If I remove someone from my network, I certainly do not want to encourage him to be keeping tabs on me! I want all traces of my profile out of his network. He can always do a search on me if he is really interested! But to keep my pic there as a a reminder is unnecessary and only encourages him to contact me. imho, the Friends Network should be a double opt-in. If at any time one of the two opts out, there is no link between the two. Thanks for asking the question. I hope you do make this change as soon as possible.
| |||
|
Hi, When we first signed on, we ended up waiting 2 months before excepting any invites as we were leaning what was what. So the 60 to 90 day makes sense. Two thumbs up on the break the network on both sides. Also like to see the trash empty every 30? days on declined invites. Keep working on the speed!! Thanks, Toys
| |||
5/7/2006 5:26 pm |
All of your changes are going to be great, but I don't think that you are addressing the biggest headache of all of us paying males. **** FAKE FEMALE PROFILES **** This would be eliminated if you did a one time member charge of $5 or $10 unless they go to silver or gold status....Then charge them nothing. This would only be charged the first time the profile was created. You would also have to make sure that credit card name and name of new member was the same.... Now this would reduce your fakes, but are you even interested in reducing your fake females????? P.S. beisides that I love Affairlook.
| |||
5/7/2006 5:47 pm |
If I delete someone from my Friends Network, I don't want to still be in theirs. Also, if the last time someone visited the site was a year or more ago, delete their profile. Wouldn't doing so be a benefit on the technical side? If I do a search, I don't want to come across profiles that haven't been logged on in the year 2006--it's five months old already--that many months of inactivity deserves/warrants deletion. One last thing, is there a way you can alert to new mail without having to click to the mailox or home page. A person can be in blog land can be there for a quite awhile and not realize that they have new mail. GossipJunkie "Dance like nobody's watching"
| |||
|
i just assumed that if i removed someone from my network i was removed from thiers.. silly me!! i still want blocked members stopped from SEEING my profile or blog... as i say in my blog.. it is like letting peeping toms have access to your windows, even if they can't get thru the door.. Virtue Alone Ennobles
| |||
|
when either member cuts the friend link, then friends would "disappear" from the member's list. I'm personally leaning towards making this change (feedback please?) but it will not be part of this release. I think someone should have the ability to erase theirself from a friends network if they are deleting that friend. and I appreciate all your efforts and the Affairlook team. ..m.
| |||
5/7/2006 7:39 pm |
Hi LuvPump! Thanks for all the wonderful changes you've made to the site over the past couple of months, especially in the blog area. one question, I've been trying to change a friend in my network from the general category to a different one and it won't work. Is that just a sideeffect of the changes you're making, or is there another way to do it besides using the move to category button? Thanks!         
| |||
|
thanks hun I'm a   and i'm here to stay
| |||
5/8/2006 1:34 am |
Am I actually reading that ALL the deadwood profiles will be removed ENTIRELY from the site, or are they being put into hibernation?
| |||
5/8/2006 12:26 pm |
Is there any chance of getting back the old function of the View All threads? The newest threads would appear at the top, not the ones to which someone has posted the most recently. This was extremely helpful. If a group is active, new threads may never appear on the front page, and may be permanently buried. The old function at least allowed us to see all of the new ones at the top so that we could post to them, and allow them to show up on the front page. Thank you.
| |||
|
Thank you Andrew for all your efforts. I am not computer literate like some but I know that the kind of overhaul you are taking on is no simple task. I have noticed an improvement from the dead stop the whole group system was at before; there are still some problems but there has been some progress. I hope that the newly released upgrades will further enhance the group experience. I think it is important if we all understood the capabilities of the system, we could come up with some ways to work with it. I speak for myself when I say that I am not looking for to have my wishlist addressed at this point. I just want to know what are the system capabilities.
| |||
|
However, some groups have an intro thread for new members. It would be nice if this could stay at the top or have a separate section
| |||
|
He is finally acknowledging the system lags. So why not give him time to work on it. These attacks currently do not serve purpose.
| |||
5/8/2006 7:52 pm |
Yes, I am working on two projects this weekend - speeding up code for groups and upgrading our anti-fake profile code. Starting this release, we are going to be much tougher on members sending personal contact info in messages (the #1 reason why scammers have fake accounts). I will make a post soon on efforts that going on and new ways we are going to get rid of these profiles. One issue it that guys send their personal emails to these accounts and the "owner" of them then feeds them to a spam list. The only way to stop them is to make it harder to give them contact info. We have to still let real members be able to get email without paying. We hate having fake profiles posted as it reduces the the community of the site. We're working hard to fight it - improvements rolled out soon Comment on the Contact Info Issue. I understand all the issues you noted, and I know the possible risk someone takes posting contact info to get more contact with a person who is an Affairlook member. But I have a problem. Affairlook is an Adult site, and as such is blocked by a lot of servers. I worked at a site that allowed access to my e-mail accounts and some CHAT software, but not Affairlook. If I wanted to talk to someone I meet here I was out of luck. I have been a target of west African scammers, but I still want to be able to pass contact info to some people I meet here. Since I pay the extra for standard members to e-mail me here why not let me feed non-Affairlook contact info back to allow non-adult site access to my friends when I want? Just a thought from an Old EMT. Thanks for the site. A Gold + member
| |||
|
Thanks for the feedback - we have a multiple prong strategy that will be rolled out soon. We don't want to block 100% of contact info sending, just people who send it out all the time before they get to know someone.
|
Become a member to create a blog
