Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > community > AFF Headquarters |
Yes, You Can Add 200 Photos To Your Profile Photos
|
Yes, You Can Add 200 Photos To Your Profile Photos  Have you noticed that many members started showing more than 20 photos in their profile photos? Yeah, you can do that now. Here's how it works: * Profile photos are automatically added to your Profile Photo Album * Every Profile Album can have up to 200 photos * You can have up to a maximum of 5000 photos in your albums (25 albums of 200 photos each) * There's no limit to the amount of albums you can have. Well, technically the limit is 5000 albums with 1 photo each, but please don't do that There is no limit by membership. Standard, Silver and Gold all have the same 200 photos per album/5000 total limit. Community Challenge! I want to know who the first person to 200 photos is. Actually, I'll give 6 free months Gold to the first person who adds 200 photos to their Profile album, then posts here about it. That's a reward-able task! Update: japaneseass was the first to get 200 profile photos up. Congrats! |
|||||||
|
I've pimped your challenge in my blog.
| ||||||
|
They can always make another album with the same photos and make it public.
| ||||||
|
Since when I joined members could have 20 pix on their profile, then albums could have many more. And several albums were allowed. Lots of people have a head start on me, and I could just go work a little and pay some money and get 6 months gold membership. I was gold earlier, and got kinda pissed off when a couple of my emails got ignored. While I'm glad about the new feature, and I'm sure the marketing geniuses think they will have a better conversion rate for non paying members becoming paying members, I still believe that retention of paying members would be a better business plan. Conversion rate might get better if the policy allowed standard members to look at a profile, and maybe 1% of the 5000 pix in a profile. They might decide to pay to look at more. But if standard members cannot look at even a profile, or one single pic, FFN will still have a maybe good conversion rate (300 million unique views with 1 million subscribers) if that's considered good, and I doubt the retention rate (average subscriber pays for six months) will increase. Sorry, I will not try to upload a couple hundred or thousand pix when many others have them in their profile and albums already. While it might be interesting to create 5000 albums with one pic each, just to test the system, I won't do that either. It's my opinion that if FFN wants to be successful in the proposed IPO, FFN needs to focus on retention rather than conversion. If the people that drop out of paying could be reduced, and it could be easily, and looking at what standard members could get by subscribing were addressed by other than the marketing wizards now employed, the site could grow revenue instead of losing money year after year. Suggestion: Let standard members look at a profile. Limit the ways they communicate, as already is done, but let them look at a profile. Let them look at a couple of low resolution pix. Maybe not let them look at videos. But if you do not let them even access the profile, they will lose interest. Let them upload 5000 pix and have a hard time finding or looking at their own profile, well, I guess you'll have rights to their user supplied content. Maybe that's marketable, but only if FFN survives. Looking at the prospectus concerning the IPO for FFN, I don't get the feeling that FFN really cares. I guess I am biased. I sent two emails to customer service that have gone ignored. Previous messages to customer service got responded to rather quickly. I think the target demographic should be a little different than it seems to be. Right now, it seems to be aimed at young horny males. Get them to pay for six months, then recruit more. Maybe it works, but according to the SEC filing, the numbers are a problem. And according to the actual women who are active on the site, who write on the A/L and blog, they get impatient with the young boys you solicit. And the young boys get really pissy because they don't get laid in the satisfaction period, the warranty. That pisses off the women too. "wont2sukmy coke" Look around a little, or ask satisfied customers, or not so satisfied customers. It uses your resources, and no one is happy. Maybe I'll try to make a few thousand albums with one pic each. I don't have the energy for that, well, maybe I do. Does the staff at FFN have the resources to check them all? I'll leave my pix at three for now. I'll keep posting on my blog, and a few others. I'll keep hoping that FFN will develop an intelligent business model, but I'll not hold my breath. I really do believe that Affairlook/FFN has lots of potential, but I'm half blind to the problems. I'm not going to compete for six months of gold membership. I bought more than that already. I could buy a year and a half at a cheap price for being an active standard member for less than I paid for six months. But your employer does not seem to care even enough to respond to my last two emails to customer service, when I was gold. With the debt the company has, and the lack of customer concern that has been my experience, I will not invest in the IPO. And I will not consider paying for a membership in a company that may not be able to deliver on the contract. I know that everything I have written can be deleted in just a few mouse clicks. I know that I'm not very bright. It's entertainment to me. I'm actually trying to help, to help the company provide me with more entertainment I'll pay for. But in the long run, it really doesn't matter. I'll find more entertainment, you'll use your experience to find another job. Marc Bell will still find other assets to purchase on the Vegas strip. But it saddens me to see it go that way. I'm going to go to the musical keyboard now and get away from the typonese one. I'd like to listen to Leon Russel's "Back to the Island" but since my vinyl is warped, I have to play it myself. "...well I hope you understand..."...Beach Labore pro Pacem
| ||||||
|
Yay! I love being able to have more photos! I think this is a great improvement. Not to say I can't think of others I'd like to see! Like notifications for new blog comments and replies to comments. How about free memberships for members like me whose photo albums have generated 100's of thousands of views. I'm making YOU MONEY! And, the number 1 thing I'd like to see: the ability to block asshats from viewing my profile and photos. There are some *real* lame-os out there, Affairlook! And if I didn't love blogging so much and all the attention I get there, I'd strip my profile down to a gray box and take down my videos. ***
| ||||||
|
That is a lots. Thanks for letting us know. I will put a link to this topic on my blog.
| ||||||
|
Does it count if someone adding photos not of them but of interest or general stuffs to get the rewards you are giving out here for the first to reach 200? Just wondering.  I sure have some thousand of photos of myself since the time I use digital camera. But I don't it all out on the internet. Most are for my eyes only.
| ||||||
|
fix the glitches and i'll pay my own membership...even though my albums are private for my network friends i see them coming up with votes and comments even though that stuff was shut off years ago every time you do something new something old messes up and who has 200 pictures of themselves LOL i have 200 or more of my doggies not me    je ne regrette rien
| ||||||
|
200 - 5000 Profile Photos  That is an absolute waste of space of the SCSI drives on the servers. The odds of a member on this site having even 100 photos (collectively)on their profile (Main photo album + Public and Private) would be close to 1 out of 30,000 members I will venture to say. Only way the site will ever see members uploading more then the 20 (required to complete profile) is giving points on each additional photo they upload as done with the first 5 photos uploaded to a profile. There is already WASTED space on the servers with the "Create/Edit More Pages" on the Members Profile; in addition, that very few members even know exist. One of the reasons is that Standard members are unable to view another members additional page if the member they are viewing has one or not. What is the sense in having More Pages to our profiles if the vast majority of members cannot see them even if we use the site internal linking to them??? Isn't having a Blog the same thing as having more pages on our profile.
Members are getting more and more sick and tired of always seeing additional gimmicks of additional features constantly added to the site format. And members continuously keep expressing how they are sick and tired of them and want things that are plagued with bugs to being fixed. Many of the active Bloggers of this site have expressed many of times the dissatisfaction of the Blog format that keeps them from being able to using table designs in their posting because it throws the entire members Blog home page format out of proportion because of the table width declaration they may use is null and voided by a couple of lines of CSS coding of the site format. Group moderators experience more bugs then almost any other forum of this site. Hell for a month now moderators cannot even edit their group description. I believe the date for that fix was to be release today (1-15-2010); yet still moderators cannot edit the group description field to being saved as new. Are we the members really asking for way to much by wanting the features and etc...of the site to working properly instead of having additional features added? When the former CEO Andrew Conru first started his focus on site fixes\improvements\enhancements he had the right idea to tackling that task in the beginning by keeping a focus on one forum at a time. But for some reason he went way off the path with trying to do\have more then one forums done at a time. Maybe if the programming and development "team" started thinking as a team against another competitor as in sports (or chess)...they would realize to winning against another team is breaking the other down systematically one piece at a time instead trying all at once. It is the same strategics that the greatest of conquers in history used in battles to defeating enemies and even nations. As for the "DICK PICS"; I always find it hilarious how many members complain about the "cock shots" used by the male members of this site. It's so damn funny that whenever I decide to show my "cock shot" as a main photo the views by female members and couples of my profile jump up by over 80%. In addition, THERE'S a LOT of "CUNT SHOTS" used as main profile photos on this site too. That seems to always be negated to mentioning. It is part of the nature/design/purpose/intent of this site and it is an OPTION FOR ANY MEMBER THAT DOES NOT WANT TO VIEW THEM. If you DO NOT WANT TO VIEW "DICK SHOTS" AND "CUNT SHOTS" THEN TURN YOUR "CONTENT VIEWER" ON and stop BITCHING about what YOU personally do not want to seeing or viewing. This is not a "G" rated site. 
| ||||||
|
Seems like someone was right lol she did get slammed and didn't even complain like the one bashing. roflmao how funny is that. Seems to me a legitemate statement was made, men MORE than women have this dire need to shove that cock out there with as many poses as possible. THAT was the statement I saw. She said 'she could see 200 of them in 200 profiles'. That wasn't telling anyone to not use them at all. Amazing how some people read into shit.. got a complex there dude?? Personally, no it isn't a g rated site, BUT I DON'T WANT TO SEE ALL THE FUCKING COCK SHOTS EITHER!! And I have yet to see a woman with 20 pussy shots like the guys that have 20 dick shots. So now I suppose I am whining and should use my tools also roflmao All because I made a statement. Glad you like the gays faking as women and crap looking at your dick. I personally don't like meat facing me in the morning!! or any day for that matter.
| ||||||
|
Seems like someone was right lol she did get slammed and didn't even complain like the one bashing. roflmao how funny is that. Seems to me a legitemate statement was made, men MORE than women have this dire need to shove that cock out there with as many poses as possible. THAT was the statement I saw. She said 'she could see 200 of them in 200 profiles'. That wasn't telling anyone to not use them at all. Amazing how some people read into shit.. got a complex there dude?? Personally, no it isn't a g rated site, BUT I DON'T WANT TO SEE ALL THE FUCKING COCK SHOTS EITHER!! And I have yet to see a woman with 20 pussy shots like the guys that have 20 dick shots. So now I suppose I am whining and should use my tools also roflmao All because I made a statement. Glad you like the gays faking as women and crap looking at your dick. I personally don't like meat facing me in the morning!! or any day for that matter. I was merely making a point in concerns to the types of photos and the options that any and all members have when it comes to the type of content a member photo may be . Mainly they are only seen as members primary profile pics in the different forums of the site. It is not like all 200+ photos a member has in their profile album is going to be shoved down anyone's throat as it was being made out to be. Secondly, it is the viewing members option to viewing another members photo album. No ones arms is being twisted to having to open the photo album in a members profile in the first place. Thirdly, I did not post to insult any one member for their opinion and etc... However, you made a point to be with "got a complex there dude??" That's the problem with individuals like yourself, it is all fine and good that you and anyone else that thinks the same to making or giving an opinion in concern to topic as such and is wrong for anyone else that may oppose it with their opinions. Lastly... "So now I suppose I am whining and should use my tools also roflmao". To answering that...Yes, because you do have an option not to viewing the photos that you find offensive to viewing or do not want to seeing. All members have that option; yet, some of you rather "whine", "complain", or "bitch" about it when the fact is that you have complete control over it with one click of your mouse. Some of you have a feeling that you have the rights to dictate over other members what kind of photo they can use as their main profile photo or having in their albums or to viewing of another member that may also want to see explicit photos. Hell...I would almost say that you and others that think the same as you believe that individuals should not have the freedom of self expression or having equal rights. Which by the way....the "Content Filter" option at the top of the site page gives all members equal rights when it comes to the photos. As far as I am concern in regards to this....I have nothing more to respond back to you or any other member.
| ||||||
|
Sorry, I will disagree totally. Nowhere did she or anyone say it would be 'shoved down' anyones throat. She made a statement that she couldn't wait to see how many PUT 200 pics of their dicks in there. Not one mention of forced to look at anywhere. You read that into it for some reason known ONLY to you. Hence the hang up statement I made. As only one person 'made a joke' about the fools that do use up ALL their pics with penis shots, it was obvious who it was aimed at. I see nowhere that anyone was a 'dictator' either, no one but you is upset. LOL I have answered posts from women and messages from women that truly don't want to see a dick shot. I merely stood up for them as well, no saying anyone HAD to or did NOT have to put up any photo. LOL Again, no one said anything about force, and I agree. I am sure some moron is going to put up as man dick shots as he can and it will be LAUGHABLE at best. If it offends you that there are those of us that see it as moronic, that is your problem dude. Apparently no one ELSE can have freedom of expression unless it matches yours.. You are the one having the outburst about it. I am laughing!! And I am a guy laughing.
| ||||||
|
Sorry, I will disagree totally. Nowhere did she or anyone say it would be 'shoved down' anyones throat. She made a statement that she couldn't wait to see how many PUT 200 pics of their dicks in there. Not one mention of forced to look at anywhere. You read that into it for some reason known ONLY to you. Hence the hang up statement I made. As only one person 'made a joke' about the fools that do use up ALL their pics with penis shots, it was obvious who it was aimed at. I see nowhere that anyone was a 'dictator' either, no one but you is upset. LOL I have answered posts from women and messages from women that truly don't want to see a dick shot. I merely stood up for them as well, no saying anyone HAD to or did NOT have to put up any photo. LOL Again, no one said anything about force, and I agree. I am sure some moron is going to put up as man dick shots as he can and it will be LAUGHABLE at best. If it offends you that there are those of us that see it as moronic, that is your problem dude. Apparently no one ELSE can have freedom of expression unless it matches yours.. You are the one having the outburst about it. I am laughing!! And I am a guy laughing. For your info Snoopy...I have known of Rdy on this site for at least over 6 years and she has always been one down on the types of photos that male members use (meaning cock shots) the same as several of other members are and have been as well over the years. Which is her rights and all others as well. Rdy, if you reading this in no way is it meant as insult, flaming, slamming or anything of such towards you. It is a fact that can be seen and read in the paper trails (archives) of postings in the Advice Lines, Article section, Groups and Blogs. We both know as well we both have different points of view on this from past. For myself...I stand in the middle when it comes to the explicit photos that any member (male,female or couple) may place on their profile or in a photo album. Years ago we members did not have an option to not having to see the cock, pussy, tits, ass, masturbation, sex acts and etc... photos that many members use on this site to attracting those like minded to themselves. There was no "Content Filter". Now all members do have the option of a "Content Filter" in regards to the sexually explicit photos to seeing them or not on their computer screens while surfing this site. Yet, member(s) continuously going on and on and on how they are sick of seeing cock shots of the male members or whatever have you after the option has been given to the members is like digging a dead horse out of the ground and continuously beating it. But hey....I am simply the asshole that stood up to making a point that an option is there if members do not like seeing cock shots (or whatever sexually explicit photo) with not having to be subjected to them while noone else did or had.
| ||||||
|
I have uploaded more than 200 pics in the last twelve hours or so, about 169 of which have been approved which brings my number of approved profile pics up to 189. Still, something weird seems to happen every now and then. When I reached 162 I checked my pics page and there it said that I'd uploaded about 184 or so but I knew I had uploaded more. Figuring they'd been deleted rather than approved I uploaded a bunch of new ones to get me back up to 200. A little later I had 165 approved and then the pics page said I had 232 or so uploaded. A while later the figure was something like 220 but I could only view 200 of them. A while I wondered if it was because I created a new album and uploade about 20+ pics into it but the icon for that album still stands as empty on my pics page, the pics I uploaded only becoming visible if I open the album. A while I ago I seemed to be missing pics again since I had gotten 189 approved but my pics page now said I had only uploaded 192 pics. So again I uploaded some more and then I came up to 204 or 202 pics. It's still at this level though I can only view 200 of them. On another note. It seems one can only upload nine or so pics at a time for the profile photos album, I've tried and this seems to be the limit. But when it comes to albums one can upload at least 20 pics at one time which I did when I created my new album. Is this intentional or some sort of glitch? Ps, a while ago I mentioned a bug in this blog which made my comments and posts appear one or several days later after I'd posted them to other members of this site. I.e. I could see them but others couldn't. Lately I seem to be free of this bug and I hope it lasts. I just wanted to say that if this is due to Affairlook customer service taking a look at it and fixing it then I am very grateful indeed  , ds.Tempted A perfect marriage Or When the kids are away the parents will play What I wish awaited me at home when I came home today A beachfantasy as suggested by a lovely Lady  
| ||||||
|
I just wanted to note that I've reached 195 approved profile pics now. Btw, if I might make a suggestion it would be that Affairlook sends out that "your photo has been approved"-mail once per group of photos uploaded at any one time rather than one e-mail per photo. This might already be the policy, I'm not sure, I just know that it feels like I've been drowning in those e-mails all evening. Even though it is of course gratifying to get them I thought this might ease the burden on people's e-mail accounts a bit. Tempted A perfect marriage Or When the kids are away the parents will play What I wish awaited me at home when I came home today A beachfantasy as suggested by a lovely Lady
| ||||||
|
RE: Community Challenge! I want to know who the first person to 200 photos is. Actually, I'll give 6 free months Gold to the first person who adds 200 photos to their Profile album, then posts here about it. That's a reward-able task! i just added all 200 pics in my profile...20 pics x 10 pages...i am now waiting for Affairlook to approve...it surely took some time...
| ||||||
|
My my how the tone has changed. Why couldn't you have posted all of that the FIRST time rather than the original post that was filled with things like "stop your bitching" and words like "whining" and all the negativity and anger with caps and all?? It wouldn't have looked so bad if you had just posted what you JUST posted as it stands the FIRST time you addressed the photo issue. Those things are what made it look like an attack.
| ||||||
|
As for my personal thoughts, I could care less what a person posts as their photos. But I do question that if they feel that their best attribute is their member, then if I were a woman that would be the biggest red flag because not every woman is looking for a disembodied cock. I believe more women actually "choose" who they are going to actually meet up with regardless of all the photos, based more on the person's personality and the way the rest of him looks. If they are looking for a quick roll in the hay and she is not, no matter what his dick looks like or how many pictures he has of him screwing other women, it will not entice to have sex. I have even posted in another blog about how many times a woman has said "if you only looked different" because as much as people say it is shallow and don't want to hear it, your FACE does count as well as your body, not just the penis. Just sayin.
| ||||||
|
i have uploaded 200 pics uploaded...and i saw in my eyes it was in the edit my picture page...all 200...now it is a few hours later, some of the pics are disappearing??? is this another new tactics of Affairlook??? why my pics are disappearing??? i didn't receive my pics are not approved...so it was there once, and now it's gone...where did it go??? and why is this happening??? so much for doing this...
| ||||||
|
I'm now up to 197 approved pics out of 205 uploaded. Btw, I apparently spoke too soon about not having any delay problems. Apparently some of my comments still don't show up to others until after some time. I've just been informed that one of my comments, an answer to a reply to an earlier comment, still hasn't shown up to the owner of the blog who had to use the "where am I quoted?"-feature to find it. That comment was in this post by Nascarfox: Increase the of photos on your profile Tempted A perfect marriage Or When the kids are away the parents will play What I wish awaited me at home when I came home today A beachfantasy as suggested by a lovely Lady
| ||||||
|
I've now gotten 200 pics approved (according to my profile page I've even got 201 approved profile photos). Tempted A perfect marriage Or When the kids are away the parents will play What I wish awaited me at home when I came home today A beachfantasy as suggested by a lovely Lady
| ||||||
|
Interesting for me today. Went to add some photos and I added and album. Later I wanted to add pics to another new album and it would not add a new album, just added the pics sort of randomly to different albums. How I read I can have 5000 albums (no I wont do that...) but it seems it threw up on my 6th one. Alas, now the clamoring public of 1 will just have to deal with it. 
| ||||||
|
Just an observation: Although the present Rdy being referenced does not, I have looked at the sites of several of the women who "don't want dick in their face" and low and behold.... Their profiles look like a gynecological textbook. Don't care actually, but have just found it amusing. I guess some folks can only accept those who comply with their own predilections. I am also surprised by the profiles that list all the things that they don't want and will instantly get you banned for life. So many "don't wants" that you forget what the original "want" was. Perhaps they are so inundated with objectionable material that they just snap! Alas, I do not have that problem....
| ||||||
|
Interesting for me today. Went to add some photos and I added and album. Later I wanted to add pics to another new album and it would not add a new album, just added the pics sort of randomly to different albums. How I read I can have 5000 albums (no I wont do that...) but it seems it threw up on my 6th one. Alas, now the clamoring public of 1 will just have to deal with it.
| ||||||
|
As usual, I come lately into a discussion, but never too late to have a small input. My first question would be WHY in the name of all that is HOLY would ANYONE want to have that many photos here or any place else other than their own photo album at home!!! Does any sane person actually believe that people want to sit for hours looking at that many photos of ONE person, album after album? If I am gonna spend that amount of time looking at ONE thing, be it on here or anywhere else, it better be damn spectacular and pay me to do it. Perhaps, the photos can go back to their birthing, and build from there until current times!!. Of course as the discussion has evolved into the ever controversial dick and female genitalia debate, it does not surprise me a bit. It would be a far more fair statement to say, that NOT ALL MEN want to stare up a womans crotch, or see her with some guys equipment in her mouth. NOT ALL WOMEN want to see a mans crotch either with it dressed in barbie clothes, wearing a watch, having a smiley face, compared to a coke can, and a plethora of other spiffey items that they think is so cute. Gosh, us poor women are rather limited aren't we in that arena. Sadly, apparently, men fail to realize, that when they brag so proudly about the percentage of views going UP, when their DICK GOES UP, they are not taking into consideration all the NEW PEOPLE that sign up DAILY, be they standard or dumb enough to pay for this site. THEY are a large part of the VIEWS, having just arrived here, and are in the learning, boot camp stage of innundation. With THAT said, just because they are getting a HIGHER percentage of LOOKS, does NOT equate to HIGHER SUCCESS RATE. It means that newbies, are looking, and a hell of a lot of gay men who love those shots. I guess if that is what makes your boat float, is KNOWING you have a HUGE percentage of VIEWERS, and that strokes your ego, makes you feel popular, hey go for it. A confident, person, does not need to display their intestines, or prove they have had an appendectomy or hemorroidectomy, to be attractive!!. I quite agree with Snoopy, in how things were STATED, or more appropriately SCREAMED so no one would miss the opinion. Umm Opinions are just like A**holes, EVERYONE HAS ONE. NOT every one agrees. What a dull world we would live in if we did. There is a very old adage, that goes, "It isn't WHAT you say, it's HOW YOU SAY IT", whoops, yes I shouted didn't I!!. Cloaked comments, even with a missing name is clearly understood as to WHO is being discussed, sorta like a blog post a while back "The Elephant in the living room". It's there, but no one will address that fact. Amazingly, I don't even need to follow any sort of paper trail, to see, read, know, and understand how some people have evolved into what they at one time believed to be stupid, and unacceptable behavior. Even founded a group just so other likeminded people could gather there, to AVOID just such tripe and trash. But what they heck, you know the old saying, " If you can't beatem, join them" Was a time that sort of picture was "unacceptable" to even belong to a group, but as in all evolution, that has fallen into the gutter and been trampled. Gosh, I hope I don't get censured for being a "name dropper" it seems that is also acceptable behavior. Gosh, I even at one time belonged to a group that specifically banned ANY crotch shots, my memory is not that short that I cannot remember THAT. Is this an adult site, you couldn't prove it by me, with the behavior of some people that are here. If one conducted a poll the fact that NOT ALL people are here for anatomy lessons, or to find a quick hook up would be very obvious. They have various and sundry other reasons for being here, have stated it CLEARLY, the alternative reasons for being here. For YEARS in the Mag, and blogs, and other places the MAJORITY of females that said they did NOT want or like the dick pics, were tremendously overwhelming, but like the rest of the world, that fact is ignored, and it is only the "OPINION" of the ones howling how it is their right to post them here and if anyone don't like it hit the bricks. It is those who WANT their pics here, well as snoopy said, if that is your BEST foot forward, there are a hell of a LOT of males in BIG trouble on here. Are there men/women who will go out with and sleep with anyone, anywhere anytime? HELL YESS!!! BUT not the majority, nor will the majority NOT want to see the ENTIRE package. There are a lot of people who will commit murder, but not EVERYONE on this planet WILL. If it were believed that the "dick pic" is the clincher, and the bait, then every man and woman needs to go out without their clothes on and wave it around like a worm on a hook waiting for a bite!! No brains required, no conversation, personality, nada required, just your anatomy. Sigh, imagine spending your entire life, talking to the head of a dick, or up some womans crotch, and never seeing or knowing anything else about them. I don't give a dang who they are, if you need to keep a bag on the persons head so you don't barff, if they have body odor so strong your stomach churns, if they don't have all their teeth, just good ole gums, their hygiene was practiced about 6 months ago, they pick their nose and teeth at the same time!, you are NOT going to go out with or sleep with them be they male or female with a blue ribbon, first place, bronzed plaqued, Gold Cup trophy anatomy. IF that were true!!!! then the males and females on this site should just start looking at the nastiest, ugliest counterparts they can find and see how fast they get turned on just looking at them, and evaluate how QUICK they are going to want to hop into bed with them as well. ALL of the pieces have to be together to put the puzzle together, NOT just bits or pieces waved around in glory. Now as this entire blog has been blown off track by a greater discussion of the human anatomy, what about the ORIGINAL point of A MILLION photos for EACH PERSON, might as well be that many as it's going to sure as heck seem like that many being poured and dumped into a site that has far too many other problems that need to be dealt with than having egotistical people have a new platform for stroking their ego with that many pictures. Just my own opinion, as I see it, I do not expect all and everyone to agree with me, nor do I honestly care if you do or do not. As you have exercised your "right" to state your opinions I have also exercised MY "right" to state mine. The preservation of your or anyone else's rights, does NOT give anyone else the right to trample MY rights into the ground nor find fault with having them either. Lady
| ||||||
|
2oo Hundred,,,I could care less. But just getting ANY approved is now near impossible without an EXTREME time in pending status or it disappearing completely,,, Affairlook Parody Of a Real Sex Site
|
Become a member to create a blog
