Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > community > AFF Headquarters |
January 2010 Suggestion Box
|
January 2010 Suggestion Box Reminding you that we should all say "Twenty-Ten", Instead of "Two-Thousand-Ten" because "Twenty-Ten" sounds cooler.  |
|||||||
12/31/2009 1:57 pm |
It does sound cooler to say "Twenty-Ten" as long as we don't have to say "Ten-Four" whenever we agree with someone. Love to please ladies and gents however they desire. Your pleasure is my sexual fulfillment!! 
| ||||||
|
 Happy Twenty Ten Ryan!!!
| ||||||
|
"Godt nytt år to-tusen-og-ti!" It's official Norwegian pronounciation, and it is already 2010 here. <- Profile photo courtesy of Bonding with coworkers
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
1/4/2010 3:31 pm |
I would like to see the site take threats and harassment in the advice line and in the articles section of the magazine seriously.It also seems like maybe the site's TOU should be revised,because it's my opinion that there is not much point to having rules if they don't prevent members from being harassed or threatened.
| ||||||
|
Quoting Ryan in response to Bromance Buddy: I'm sure that letting standards view all cams is a business decision, but one I don't really understand. I'll ask. There is no need to entertain either of his suggestions...you can already block anyone from viewing your cam...I don't know if you were here yet when the site decided very arbitrarily to not allow standards to view cams at all...lets just say it wasn't very pretty...and not a very good decision...which was reversed post haste...in order for people to evaluate if they want to subscribe...they have to be able to do somethings other paying members might not like...such as viewing cams...
| ||||||
|
community replies on 1/5/2010 2:15 pm: When did they change this one? Was it in 2008 or 2009? Here you go Ryan. 4/2/08 ~ Effective Immediately, Standard members no longer able to view webcams 4/20/08 ~ UPDATE Standard members once again able to view webcams
| ||||||
|
Just a thought...might want to re-think the order of the postings on this blog...like the newest go to the bottom...that way some duplication might be avoided...when reporting bugs and such...who knows it might even encourage reading around here...
| ||||||
|
I think they should definitely have more filters in place for cammers. Not necessarily "bans", but filters for who you want to see your cam.
| ||||||
|
OK ..just WHAT have y'all done to the chatrooms ? They are horribly slow refresh times, queues for posts to actually HIT the boards (not to mention the random post eaten or sent gods only know where) and then, random refresh to black and white, and an entirely different font and size. Then, it reloads back again. All of this has been happening since BEFORE the new year - I thought it was part and parcel of a new "upgrade" but so much is hinky I think there are whole families of bugs in the code. ~ [blog kelidgh]~ I am, indeed 
| ||||||
|
google babelfish and use their translator .. small, easy to use and has (I think) about 15 languages loaded - all with US alphabetical characters.... ~ [blog kelidgh]~ I am, indeed
| ||||||
|
I have really come today to ask for an explanation. Now I realise that this is not a suggestion and that you are not the target for all the things wrong in Affairlook... but... I would like to say, upfront, as well that this is a change in tack. Instead of highlighting an area and asking that you solve it, this time I am asking you to explain to me how this situation comes to be, so that I can rationalise it and understand why it never gets fixed, or is taking so long. About once a month (or every two months) I notice, in the searches that I do, a few young ladies who seem to share a lot in common. They are: - all London based, usually West London - in the age range 23-25 - always uses the same form of username 'sexual name followed by a number' - always logged in and out at the same times - always uses the same 'type' of stolen picture for each generation of profiles, in this case a topless woman - always uses the same type of 5 line profile So I round up the profiles and report them and they get removed. The current list is: brianna198507 dontstop17433 sexfriend17848 naughty158392 sofunn51492 sweety72439 titegal6722 luvhard8222 wetlips69278 giveit2me771 dreamer80672 These are the previous profile names that I have reported... since I started saving the profile names to see how many it got to (remember that there have been months and months of unrecorded names): hardnfun18762 silkysoft1822 2townwithme143 mytuch17421 itsbest78392 groovin001673 momentus838653 ultimate19422 newnhot184 lickn69 sexygirl1200 pussy4pleasure12 allnite7291 cozygirl911 riteluv58211 niteluv82433 heythere62783 fantasygal02759 doitnow67211 notnluv4711 attraction652043 dreamer78222 Some people, from the old A/L would say, at this point, 'who made you the police..?' They are also the same people who would complain of 'fakes'. In essence if this is going to be an effective website then people like this person need to be prevented from making profiles and it is in all paying members interests to stop that. Now this person never changes their pattern and so this is what I would like explained: i) is it a computer program creating these profiles? ii) why can this person not be I.P. banned... why does the site allow them to come back? iii) Is it the site themselves? There have been allegations that the site creates its own profiles to boost figures? iv) why do these profiles get approved? They are very easy to spot. Why can they so easily slip through the net? v) why do I have to spend my time rounding them up? I am not the site police, I am merely a citizen. So why do I have to spend so much time reporting them to the site police? What are the site police doing? Another example of this is sophiemariex. I have reported her numerous times. Why? Because she is using a picture, on her profile, of Ashley Dupre (still up) a New York based prostitute who was involved with the Eliot Spitzer sex scandal. She has not even been required to take the picture down. sexycomar is based in Birmingham London (the equivalent of saying that I am cased in Chicago Boston)... her picture is obviously a stolen glamour soft porn pic, unless her ex is a professional photographer with a studio equipped with at least 4 pro flash. Reported, no action taken. At this point I want to contextualise that I am not someone who thinks that everyone is a fake. No am I bitter that my ex left me, a woman hater who obsesses over fake profiles as an explanation as to why I cannot get laid. But as I wonder through Affairlook these fake profiles are so easily spotted that I just wonder why they are not more effectively dealt with when they are created and submitted, when they active and when honest members report them... the net effect of not dealing with them is that it cheapens the brand.
| ||||||
|
When are you going to do the full site block you talked about last year, I have reported the same guys several times and have them blocked from everything I can but the fact they can still contact me on IM chat. Yes I ignore them but they still keep on contacting I know I am only a standard member but I think this is something many of us want
| ||||||
|
As an addendum to my comment this concern seems to be a growing theme.... fake pictures the above A/L link is nothing to do with me, but it is interesting to see that the concerns outlined are growing.
| ||||||
|
While on the topic. Why does a member with high kudous have more strengh reporting than any silver member. We are ALL EQUAL...............So those who cheat best, have the most say. JUST LOSE KUDOUS, and i have heaps.......so hang me but its rubbish, more fun stuff like comps. I got the email re calender comp from parent company......mabe could have broken it down for all Ages/female/male/couples........I know its hard with so many members but 500 only trade kudous, get rid of it...........Oh i'm first page, if you trade and don't like the truth don't give me kudous......ITS BS, Just creates 'hate'. Ian  love the cute smiley faces  
| ||||||
1/16/2010 2:41 pm |
When are you going to do the full site block you talked about last year, I have reported the same guys several times and have them blocked from everything I can but the fact they can still contact me on IM chat. Yes I ignore them but they still keep on contacting I know I am only a standard member but I think this is something many of us want
| ||||||
|
 Totally agree......your vid. As the saying goes "GOT NOTHING NICE TO SAY, BEST SAY NOTHING". Had the same problem posted......It just puts you off, crude comment. May not be TOC, just plain RUDE. Those with a 'dick picture' or no picture at all.....they are the WORST ignore it.....   
| ||||||
|
Add to the search criteria the ability to block members by time of 'LAST VISIT' ~~ie- 'within last month' 'more than three months'. I don't want to see members that are obviously not active on the site. Of the 32million members HOW many are REALLY ACTIVE??? Affairlook Parody Of a Real Sex Site
| ||||||
|
Add to the search criteria the ability to block members by time of 'LAST VISIT' ~~ie- 'within last month' 'more than three months'. I don't want to see members that are obviously not active on the site. Of the 32million members HOW many are REALLY ACTIVE??? 
| ||||||
|
They do that... but you have to be a premium member to acces it Affairlook Parody Of a Real Sex Site
| ||||||
|
I was a premium for years and never saw that option,,,then or now It is above the series of tick boxes at the bottom, i.e. where you tick if you only want to view profiles with photos there is a drop down menu where you can select the option that we are talking about.
| ||||||
|
I was a premium for years and never saw that option,,,then or now [image]
| ||||||
|
Ditto, or perhaps take the image down?
| ||||||
|
I am not a fan of these shots either, but I think that this suggestion is a waste of time... this is a support blog on a sex site, not a church. I am sure, unpleasant though these shots can be, that we all respect these peoples rights to choose what they want as their profile pictures and can be mature enough to deal with it, without having to resort to asking Ryan to write extra code to ban their picture of choice from certain areas of the site.
| ||||||
|
Okay, well I got the wrong end of the stick, that was not what I was expecting at all... and I can see why you think that it is selfish and not pretty and the rest of it but I still do not think that Ryan should start writing code for it... The first reaction, upon viewing your example, was to laugh out loud (I do not lol)... I mean it is not nice, attractive or desirable (kind of a cross between alien, crash and a porno) but that is so undesirable, unattractive and not nice that it is funny, I think that we need to ignore and not censor.
|
Become a member to create a blog
