Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

Straight Men Get Annoyed by Gay Men - Why Do You Answer Pages?  

community 38F   
9206 posts
10/21/2009 6:57 pm
Straight Men Get Annoyed by Gay Men - Why Do You Answer Pages?


You may have noticed that there is a survey on the main page right now. It's asks you a bunch of questions about broadcasting. I'm the dood who writes these surveys, and I'm also the dood responsible for reading each of your replies and wrapping it up into a neat little presentation.

I was reading about what you guys look for before answering pages when broadcasting. Here's some interesting details:

- Straight men seem to get a lot of pages from gay men. If you're a woman or couple, they will probably respond to you.

- Women respond best if what you say in your page is nice. Don't be demanding or rude, don't tell them what to take off next. Get your profiles in order men, they look at that too before responding.

- Couples are looking for people who meet what they want (mainly gender, mainly no men). If you are contacting a couple, make sure your profile is complete.

How do you decide which page to answer? Here's a breakdown:

Men:

1) Gender (39% )
2) Profile Pic (31% )
3) What they said (11% )
4) Location (10% )
5) Age (9% )

Women:

1) What they said (36% )
2) Profile/Pic (22% )
3) Location (14% )
4) If I know them (9% )
5) Age (8% )
6) Gender (7% )
7) Marital Status (2% )

Couples:

1) Their Profile (31% )
2) What they say (27% )
3) Gender (21% )
4) Location (10% )
5) If we know them (6% )
6) Age (5% )

rm_NassyFox 62F
37014 posts
10/21/2009 8:09 pm

I very rarely ever use the IMC mainly because of the types of messages I get, but also the functionality is awful. I won't even attempt it on the stand alone.

For me, this is what I look at in this order.

1. If I know them
2. What they say
3. Location
4. Age
5. Marital Status
6. Profile
7. Photo

I am not including gender since I don't get pages from women and almost never from couples.

Slightly off topic, I don't like that the IMC comes up every time I turn on my cam. I have to ignore pages/hide them behind another window or read nasty stuff when I don't even want the IMC on.


rdy2try4 59F  
3330 posts
10/22/2009 7:09 am

I have to agree with those before me, I do NOT Like that the IMC opens with my cam. I absolutely 'hate' the comments made my the majority i.e. orders of what to do, those orders are most of the time something so disgusting I wouldn't ask my worst enemy to do them. Followed by even if they are initially nice, not picking up immediately and saying hello usually gets one called everything in the book but nice names. Come on guys, you are 'not' the only one watching. And to expect someone to drop everything for 'you' (the royal you) is just beyond ridiculous.

I truly do wish I could do this without the IMC on. Being on cam would be more fun. If I wanted a director I would get one. I don't do it to be abused. Now, I hardly ever turn it on.


MyHeartLost4U 59M
2487 posts
10/22/2009 5:35 pm

I will not even use my Cam on this site due to the MALES that are homosexual or bi-sexual sending IM's of "would love to suck your cock" and etc...

It would be nice if members could set their Cam and IMC to cupid settings or custom settings. Myself, I would like to block out all male profiles and be able to set the IMC to my preferences of gender, sexuality, age, race, and distance by having custom controls over it as well.


nd2hvfun 65F  
10021 posts
10/23/2009 12:55 am

isn't dude spelled dude..Ryan didn't use spell check why cant this site only pimp us where we want i am sure you have the men pimped on gay.com like you have us woman on gay.com so of course they may get gay male pages

je ne regrette rien


community replies on 10/23/2009 12:49 pm:
when doods say dude, they say it like doooood.

community replies on 10/23/2009 12:49 pm:
Oh, and that's not true. OutPersonals has no crossover with Affairlook.

rm_NassyFox 62F
37014 posts
10/23/2009 10:47 am

    Quoting community:
    I'm hearing a lot of that feedback in the survey too. It seems like if we could get banning to permanently work, and allow you to have filters based on your cupid settings we would be solving a lot of issues.
Cupid setting filters would be a huge plus for many.

I seldom turn to the IMC for seeking locals though. Many do, of course.

Would it be possible to set it up so that if I am in a chat room, only those in the chat room can page, assuming you can't stop the IMC from coming up with a cam?


rm_NassyFox 62F
37014 posts
10/23/2009 12:59 pm

    Quoting community:
    I hear this a lot, but just so I'm clear - when you say chat room, do you mean the chat room in a Group? Not the chat room from IMC right?
To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a "chat room from IMC".

My request would work if one is camming in a group chat room or if it is a site chat room, what I was referring to, like the regional rooms or topical rooms that are accessed via the chat link on the site toolbar.

If you can't get the cams and IMC to disassociate from each other, perhaps you can get it where only those in the chat room, group or otherwise, can access the cam and IMC of the member using it. Wherever their name is "logged" in. That could eliminate a lot of unwanted pages and attention.


wd40w 71M
6966 posts
10/30/2009 7:33 pm

If the filters on the IMC worked...this would be a mute point...from day one they have never worked. I've taken to opening up the filter preferences to 18-100 and everyone listed...just so I had the option to bounce their ass if they become creepy or rude...and I've had all types be rude and demanding...I'm a tolerant person generaly and converse with all sorts...but it's a stone drag to be paged with what I have come to call the "Perversion of the Week" pages...get the filters working and the problem is solved for the most part.

"Illigitimi Non Carborundum Est" W.F. "Bull" Halsey wd40w


rm_FXSBOB3 48M
4437 posts
10/30/2009 8:09 pm

    Quoting rm_NassyFox:
    To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a "chat room from IMC".

    My request would work if one is camming in a group chat room or if it is a site chat room, what I was referring to, like the regional rooms or topical rooms that are accessed via the chat link on the site toolbar.

    If you can't get the cams and IMC to disassociate from each other, perhaps you can get it where only those in the chat room, group or otherwise, can access the cam and IMC of the member using it. Wherever their name is "logged" in. That could eliminate a lot of unwanted pages and attention.
I made a similar suggestion on the post about 'broadcasters survey' and it seems there are *several* there that voted it down.
>>> SEPARATE THE FEATURES <<<
IMC from CAMS from CHAT from GROUPS === make each feature a SEPARATE FUNCTION

*I don't really think the people voting were really reading any of the comments there!More like a multi-profiler out for fun,,,


Affairlook
Parody Of a
Real
Sex Site


Funsex23Ab 38M

11/11/2009 6:25 pm

That's a great thread just too bad guys came out as douches in the statistics - no wonder its hard to gain woman's trust...


maverickATL 49M
11 posts
11/15/2009 2:43 pm

And to think, most of us are juggling all of these IMC and cam/chat windows with only one hand.


Become a member to create a blog