Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > 40Deuce > Sherry Stringfield's ass in 93 |
Would you hump an ape for charity (Let's make a deal)
|
Would you hump an ape for charity (Let's make a deal) If it was a normal ape I definitely would not - because that would be ape sexual assault . But if it was one of those sign language apes and they were into it ? I'd think about it . I can't imagine I'd be attractive to a lady ape , but I suppose there's freaky apes just like they're freaky humans . I mean my dick is adequate for a human lady , but I don't think it would stack up well against and ape dick . Also I should have chosen Apedick as my screen name . I like the sound of that . Anyway , if it was a sign language ape who was into me I'd probably do it for a million dollars for cancer research . Maybe even less . After all you close your eyes and is there really any difference between an ape vagina and a human vagina ? Doubt it . I could probably get some grant investigate that . Who wants sign up for some glory hole action where their may or may not be an ape on the other side ? So the , question is - would you have intercourse with an ape for charity ? And if so how much would it take ? If I was a lady I probably wouldn't . I know apes are supposed be gentle and caring creatures , but something that massive and strong going balls deep on me ? Pass . And no , I am NOT into<b> bestiality </font></b>, its for charity you philistine . When I was more into wuss rock I liked a group called the Corrs . I think they were all cousins or siblings or something , but the point is there were 2 hot ladies , 2 pretty good looking ladies and then a dude . I was always wondered if the god of sexy intercourse (who I assume is named pussypeniscockvagina and looks a little like Ron Jeremy) came to me and said I could have sex with the Corrs , but it had to be ALL Of them would I do it ? I probably wouldn't because just because someone looks good doesn't mean they're any good in bed . Sure , I'm a monster and I'm lame in the sack , but that's just an coincidence . There's plenty of less than attractive people out there who'll blow your mind in bed . But if I did make that deal I'd probably do the guy first and get it out of the way . I think doing the sexy ladies first and saving the guy for last would be the worst way to go . It you can't avoid the stick , I'd rather save the carrot for after wards . So , the question is - if you're straight would you be willing to have sex with someone of your non-preferred gender in order to have sex with some hotties of your preferred gender ? And if so how many would it take ? A frighteningly high % of woman I've been with have asked about taking me to town with a strap-on , which I've always declined , but it did make we wonder . If I was in love with a woman and she wanted to do that would I go for it ? I've never been in love but I like to think if you love someone you'd pretty much do anything they were into . Of course hopefully if they loved me back they wouldn't ask me to do things I didn't want to , but that's a different issue . So , the question is , how far are you/would you be willing to go sexually with someone you loved ? The human mind can only come up with three questions , so I guess that's it for now . But since I referenced Let's Make Deal I leave you with a bit of advice known as the Monty Haul Paradox . If you're on a game show and you're given the choice of three doors ; Behind one door is a prize and the other's are empty . You pick a door , say No. 1 [but the door is not opened], and the host , who knows what's behind the doors , opens another door , say No. 3, which has nothing . He then says to you , "Do you want to switch to door No. 2?" The answer is yes . There is a one in three chance you picked the right door from the get-go . Which means if one of the other doors is opened with nothing behind it you're twice as likely to win if you switch - because there was a two in three chance you picked wrong . Putting first by putting employees first, immediately after prioritizing fiscal responsibilities and leveraging profitability towards exceeding by empowering our employees to put (and themselves) first, in a diverse and respectful environment of only those that come first, first. |
|||
|
Totally , but I get an A for effort - if only it was the thought that counts Putting clients first by putting employees first, immediately after prioritizing fiscal responsibilities and leveraging profitability towards exceeding by empowering our employees to put clients (and themselves) first, in a diverse and respectful environment of only those that come first, first.
|
Become a member to create a blog
